Commentary on “Canadian Multiculturalism: Global Anxieties and Local Debates by Keith Banting and Will Kymlicka

867 Words 4 Pages
In “Canadian Multiculturalism: Global Anxieties and Local Debates” Keith Banting and Will Kymlicka challenge the understanding that failed multiculturalism in Europe will follow suit in Canada. Although Canada is not immune from the challenges that can come with multiculturalism, the way in which they tackle problems are country specific and do not necessarily reflect the practice or outcomes of other nations. As UK critic of multiculturalism Trevor Phillips, observes Canada to be ‘sleepwalking towards segregation’ (44) when the dynamics are far more complicated. TRANSITION SENTENCE REQUIRED
The mention of the abolition of multiculturalism for a “new” post-multiculturalist approach becomes difficult to understand. It claims, “to avoid the
…show more content…
Though, a symbolic affirmation is only as good as the commitment when it is put into practice, once it is no longer tradition, its understanding is often contested. Although, Banting and Kymlicka note that “most Canadians have no clear idea how this complex field of multiculturalism policies operate” (51), and yet it plays a major role in all levels of society. It speaks to the larger issue of voter apathy and the disinterestedness that Canadian politics and policy often receive unless it interferes with a specific individual directly. Immigration and citizenship seem almost like social afterthoughts, or non-thoughts, among the general public.
Despite the fact that the deconstruction of Canadian multiculturalism, from that of the European notion, is being assessed in the British Journal of Canadian Studies it targets valid and well-thought-out aspects of Canadian life. Banting and Kymlicka seek to illustrate the Canadian picture from a very different standpoint, observing its absence as “multicultural paradise” (52), while not over exaggerating the problems at hand. Since “there is little evidence that Canadian is facing deep new division, pervasive radicalism or an illiberal challenge to its core democratic culture” (52), the focus today is often on the social integration of newcomers. Although, a sense of pride and belonging is often, in time, established for these

Related Documents