Immanuel Kant's Theory of Judgment Essay examples

951 Words 4 Pages
What are, and what are the differences between, judgments of perception and judgments of experience for Kant? Understanding how the mind works has been a major goal throughout philosophy, and an important piece of this deals with how humans come to experience the world. Many philosophers have attempted to investigate this issue, and Hume successfully proposed a framework by which human understanding could be understood. This writing, however, spurred Kant’s philosophical mind, awaking him from his “dogmatic slumber” and leading him to develop his own framework to define thought. As Kant strongly disagreed with Hume’s stance that “it was entirely impossible for reason to think a priori,” he set to correct Hume’s misguided view of custom …show more content…
On the other hand, synthetic judgments are not founded on this principle. Synthetic judgments do not simply define some object, but rather combine two ideas to create something new. The predicate of a synthetic judgment is not obvious from the subject; the predicate seeks to add more information to the understanding. Due to the definition of these terms, judgments of perception are synthetic (p. 11). Judgments of perception are simply how one, through the senses, is able to view the outside world. These judgments are formed as a combination of empirical intuitions. Kant defines an intuition as “such a representation as would immediately depend upon the presence of the object,” and a perception is empirical by nature, as you must first experience something in order to perceive it (p. 24). Because a judgment of perception only judges an object or thing based on the senses, as seen in the examples “the room is warm, sugar sweet, and wormwood nasty,” they are only subjectively valid, or only hold true to the one having this perception (p. 39). How one intuits the object is not necessarily how the object appears, however, and “the object in itself always remains unknown” (p. 39). Pure intuitions deal with the “space and time” of objects that allow one to intuit these objects empirically, or the actual state of the object (p. 25). When humans intuit, it is an empirical

Related Documents