PETA Campaign Analysis Essay

2333 Words 10 Pages
PETA, an animal rights organization, constantly receives national attention and a certain shock value using powerful and distinct images to expose their messages of animal suffering. Starting in 1980, many of their campaigns have attempted to use powerful visuals with the use of celebrities to address the issue of animal cruelty and to persuade people to convert to an animal friendly lifestyle. Their campaign, I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur, is PETA’s most recognized yet controversial anti-fur campaign. This campaign is an individual behavior change campaign that tries to change and promote behaviors that lead to improved individual or social well-being. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur …show more content…
Cultural resources
In 2003, Michael Spector, New York reporter, analyzed the different efforts of “the women behind the most successful radical group in America, who he considers PETA’s driving force, Ingrid Newkirk. Newkirk is in charge of creation of the images and campaign strategies and ideas for PETA (52). The article not only discusses the important ideas of Newkirk but depicts his own perspective towards PETA’s strategic methods and how it has changed over time. At first, Spector’s perception of PETA is similar to how most people feel about the organization. In the article, Specter states “The organization has offended so many people in the two decades since it was founded ... that just to hear the word PETA is enough to make many people shudder—from fear, disgust, or simply weariness” (54). However, as the article continues, he gives PETA credit for guiding the attitudes of the public about animal welfare.
Unlike Michael Spector, many authors, including Alison Vogelaar and Wendy Atkins-Sayre, analyze PETA’s use of visual images and how they have a direct effect on how humans think. In Changing images of animals and humans, Alison Vogelaar expresses the opinion that “the utilitarian, consumption-based frame through which many Westerners have come to think about certain animals is challenged by a rhetoric of graphic display which is emotional (rather than rational) by its very

Related Documents