The Difference between the Miranda Rights and the Charter of Rights

902 Words 4 Pages
As Canadians, a portion of our rights that are read to us upon arrest are as follows: "It is my duty to inform you that you have the right to retain and instruct counsel in private without delay, You may call any lawyer you want.....You have the right to a reasonable opportunity to contact counsel. I am not obligated to take a statement from you or ask you to participate in any process which could provide incriminating evidence until you are certain about whether you want to exercise this right (Griffiths, 2011) It seems pretty straight forward. We get arrested and we are told we can get a lawyer. Although you may not have been through the process, you have probably seen what happens next on the latest episode of law and order or …show more content…
The key difference between the Charter of Rights and the Miranda rights is the presence of a lawyer during interrogation. In the United States your lawyer is allowed be present, in Canada he cannot be present. As well, Canadian suspects do not have the right to interrupt an interrogation to consult again with their lawyer (Ward, 2010).
This article is extremely important because it informs Canadians of what exactly their rights are, and what they are not. Current law in Canada states that once you are arrested and detained you have the right to contact council but you do not have the right to have that council present during your interrogation. However, if you are a youth or a police officer either under investigation or a potential witness, you do get grated the right to have your council present during interrogation (Friedman, 2014). If during your interrogation you decide to use your right to say nothing, police have no obligation to stop questioning you. When this happens it may be confusing to the suspect as to whether or not they are really allowed to remain silent. In the case R. v. Singh, the suspect employed his right to remain silent 18 and yet the police continued to question him each time he voiced his right (Miranda Warning, 2014).
Based on my research and what I have learned from Criminology 121, I believe the right to interrogate suspects while council is not present is an integral part

Related Documents